Italian Serie a predictions and betting tips for this week

italian serie A tips and predictions matchweek 13 - season 25 26

Predictions for this week

Udinese vs Pisa

Sat 10 Jan 14:00
1X2
Udinese 45%
BTTS
Over/Under 2.5

Como vs Bologna

Sat 10 Jan 14:00
1X2
Como 53%
First team to score
Como 58%
Over/Under 2.5

AS Roma vs Sassuolo

Sat 10 Jan 17:00
1X2
AS Roma 47%
Over/Under 2.5
First team to score
AS Roma 53%

Atalanta vs Torino

Sat 10 Jan 19:45
1X2
Atalanta 46%
Over/Under 2.5
BTTS

Lecce vs Parma

Sun 11 Jan 11:30
1X2
Parma 42%
Over/Under 2.5
BTTS

Fiorentina vs AC Milan

Sun 11 Jan 14:00
1X2
Fiorentina 38%
Over/Under 2.5
BTTS

Verona vs Lazio

Sun 11 Jan 17:00
1X2
Verona 36%
Over/Under 2.5
BTTS

Inter vs Napoli

Sun 11 Jan 19:45
1X2
Inter 50%
First team to score
Inter 56%
BTTS

Genoa vs Cagliari

Mon 12 Jan 17:30
1X2
Cagliari 42%
BTTS
Over/Under 2.5

Juventus vs Cremonese

Mon 12 Jan 19:45
1X2
Juventus 57%
Over/Under 2.5
BTTS

Serie A predictions for this week

This round is defined by low-scoring scripts. The model is far more confident in Under 2.5 and BTTS No than it is in outright winners, with several matches sitting in the 57–66% range for unders and clean-game narratives. The 1X2 leans are mostly fragile (many picks in the 37–50% band), but there’s one clear headline stance: Inter at 65% — and the supporting markets suggest a controlled match where Inter strike first more often than not.

Serie A: where the model is leaning (1X2)

The 1X2 board is thin on conviction. Inter (65%) is the only true favourite profile, while most other matches sit in coin-flip territory — “preferred outcomes” rather than confident calls. If you’re writing content, the clean angle is: don’t sell winners, sell the tempo (unders, BTTS No, and controlled game-states).

MatchKick-offMarketModel leanImplied probability
Lazio vs CremoneseSat 20 Dec 17:001X2Lazio44%
Juventus vs AS RomaSat 20 Dec 19:451X2Juventus37%
Cagliari vs PisaSun 21 Dec 11:301X2Cagliari42%
Sassuolo vs TorinoSun 21 Dec 14:001X2Sassuolo50%
Fiorentina vs UdineseSun 21 Dec 17:001X2Udinese40%
Genoa vs AtalantaSun 21 Dec 19:451X2Atalanta46%
Napoli vs ParmaWed 14 Jan 17:301X2Napoli45%
Inter vs LecceWed 14 Jan 19:451X2Inter65%
Verona vs BolognaThu 15 Jan 17:301X2Bologna44%
Como vs AC MilanThu 15 Jan 19:451X2Como42%

Outside of Inter, this is a round where the model isn’t handing out many “safe” 1X2 opinions. The more reliable story is match identity: multiple fixtures are flagged as tight, lower-event, and shaped by BTTS No / Under 2.5 reads.

Inter vs Lecce: the clearest stance on the board

If this slate has a true anchor, it’s Inter vs Lecce. Inter are the only side hitting “real favourite” territory (65%), and the supporting markets paint a controlled script: Inter score first often, and the match leans away from both teams scoring.

MarketModel leanProbability
1X2Inter win65%
First team to scoreInter67%
BTTSNo57%

The combination matters. A strong 1X2 favourite (65%) plus Inter to score first (67%) suggests early control — and BTTS No (57%) points toward a cleaner win script being more common than a wild end-to-end shootout.

The strongest model leans: where the stats are loudest

The “confidence tier” this round is dominated by unders and BTTS No, led by a standout Napoli under-call and Inter’s “score first” edge. These are the leans that most clearly define match tone.

RankMatchMarketModel leanProbability
1Inter vs LecceFirst team to scoreInter67%
2Napoli vs ParmaOver/Under 2.5Under 2.566%
3Lazio vs CremoneseOver/Under 2.5Under 2.564%
4Inter vs Lecce1X2Inter65%
5Napoli vs ParmaBTTSNo60%
6Lazio vs CremoneseBTTSNo58%
7Juventus vs AS RomaOver/Under 2.5Under 2.558%
8Fiorentina vs UdineseOver/Under 2.5Under 2.557%
9Inter vs LecceBTTSNo57%
10Genoa vs AtalantaBTTSYes57%

The key takeaway: while most leagues often give you “goals clusters”, this round gives you the opposite — multiple fixtures where the model expects control, slower tempo, and fewer clean scoring sequences.

Risk radar: favourites with fragile backing

This is the section that keeps the round honest. Several 1X2 “leans” are sitting in the 37–46% range — meaning the model is identifying the likeliest single outcome, but the combined alternatives still dominate the probability space. These are matches where the winner call is thin, so the totals and BTTS reads are often the better narrative tools.

MatchMarketFavoured outcomeProbability
Juventus vs AS Roma1X2Juventus37%
Fiorentina vs Udinese1X2Udinese40%
Cagliari vs Pisa1X2Cagliari42%
Como vs AC Milan1X2Como42%
Lazio vs Cremonese1X2Lazio44%
Verona vs Bologna1X2Bologna44%
Napoli vs Parma1X2Napoli45%
Genoa vs Atalanta1X2Atalanta46%

Notice the pattern: the model is often hesitant on winners but suggests it can read the texture of matches — especially where the game is more likely to stay contained (unders / BTTS No).

Predictions to treat with caution

These are markets where the model has an edge, but it’s thin — typically in the 51–56% range. Useful for preview colour, but not “headline” calls.

MatchMarketModel leanProbability
Cagliari vs PisaBTTSYes51%
Como vs AC MilanBTTSYes51%
Juventus vs AS RomaBTTSNo52%
Verona vs BolognaBTTSYes56%
Sassuolo vs TorinoFirst team to scoreSassuolo56%
Verona vs BolognaOver/Under 2.5Over 2.552%
Sassuolo vs TorinoBTTSYes54%
Cagliari vs PisaOver/Under 2.5Under 2.554%
Como vs AC MilanOver/Under 2.5Under 2.554%
Genoa vs AtalantaOver/Under 2.5Over 2.555%

Sassuolo–Torino is a good example of a “mild lean” fixture: Sassuolo are a 50% 1X2 preference, with a slightly stronger early-script push (56% to score first). Not a loud pick — but a useful narrative: Sassuolo start quicker than the market might expect.

Putting it together for a Serie A preview

  • Anchor the piece around Inter vs Lecce as the cleanest stance: Inter win (65%) + Inter score first (67%) + BTTS No (57%).
  • Sell the week’s identity as Under-led: Lazio–Cremonese (64% Under), Juve–Roma (58% Under), Fiorentina–Udinese (57% Under), and Napoli–Parma as the loudest “tight match” call (66% Under + 60% BTTS No).
  • Use the fragile 1X2 leans (37–46%) as tension points: the model is choosing outcomes, but it isn’t confident enough to call them “safe”.
  • Keep the thin edges (51–56%) as supporting detail — good for colour, not for headline claims.

This slate, in short, is less about winners and more about match control: the model is reading a week of tighter scorelines, fewer shootouts, and multiple fixtures where one side failing to score is a live storyline.